Federal Arctic Policy Needs to Include Science, Indigenous Knowledge and Protect Biodiversity


Canada’s new Arctic Policy Framework is a huge opportunity to strengthen Arctic communities – but it will require the best available scientific and Indigenous knowledge. Above: The remains of a bowhead whale, a species traditionally harvested by Inuit, stand watch over Hudson Strait.

The following letter was submitted on February 27th, 2018 to the Arctic Policy Framework Review, spearheaded by the Ministry of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs.

Download the letter here.

APF Submission

APF Submission2.jpg

APF Submission3

APF Submission4.jpg

APF Submission5.jpg

APF Submission6.jpg


Curious about Liber Ero Fellows’ career paths?

Curious about the career path of a Liber Ero Fellow? Read about some of our Liber Ero grads:

Sheila Colla


Diane Orihel

Aeroconservation for the fragmented skies

From birds to bacteria, airborne organisms face substantial anthropogenic impacts.

See our abstract below and read our new paper here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12347/abstract

Conservation Letters

© Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Aeroconservation for the Fragmented Skies

Authors: Christina M. Davy,
 Adam T. Ford,
 Kevin C. Fraser

Accepted manuscript online: 2 February 2017


From birds to bacteria, airborne organisms face substantial anthropogenic impacts. The airspace provides essential habitat for thousands of species, some of which spend most of their lives airborne. Despite recent calls to protect the airspace, it continues to be treated as secondary to terrestrial and aquatic habitats in policy and research. Aeroconservation integrates recent advances in aeroecology and habitat connectivity, and recognizes aerial habitats and threats as analogous to their terrestrial and aquatic counterparts. Aerial habitats are poorly represented in the ecological literature and are largely absent from environmental policy, hindering protection of aerial biodiversity. Here, we provide a framework for defining aerial habitats to advance the study of aeroconservation and the protection of the airspace in environmental policy. We illustrate how current habitat definitions explicitly disadvantage aerial species relative to non-aerial species, and review key areas of conflict between aeroconservation and human use of the airspace. Finally, we identify opportunities for research to fill critical knowledge gaps for aeroconservation. For example, aerial habitat fragmentation may impact biodiversity and ecosystem function similarly to terrestrial habitat fragmentation, and we illustrate how this can be addressed by extending existing methods and paradigms from terrestrial conservation biology up into the airspace.


This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved